Overview
Growth at a reasonable price, systematized — 77 S&P 500 names scoring highest on growth, quality and value combined, the index version of the market's oldest sensible idea.
Top Holdings
| Ticker | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA | 2.4% |
| CINF | Cincinnati Financial | 2.1% |
| PGR | Progressive | 2.1% |
| LLY | Eli Lilly | 2.1% |
| ACGL | Arch Capital | 2.0% |
| ANET | Arista Networks | 2.0% |
| EXPE | Expedia Group | 2.0% |
| META | Meta Platforms | 2.0% |
| NEM | Newmont | 2.0% |
| RCL | Royal Caribbean | 1.8% |
Fund Details
Investment Thesis
The GARP screen is the discipline most investors claim and few keep: growth required, but only at valuations the earnings justify. The result is a book where NVIDIA sits beside Cincinnati Financial — growth and quality without paying any-price multiples — and a long-run record of beating the S&P with less valuation risk. +10.5% in a narrow year is the strategy's nature: it lags manias and compounds through everything else.
Who It's For
Core-equity investors who want large-cap growth with a valuation seatbelt — the systematic middle path between growth and value funds.
10-Year History
| Year | Close | % Chg |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | $33.59 | -- |
| 2017 | $45.43 | +35.2% |
| 2018 | $45.78 | +0.8% |
| 2019 | $63.11 | +37.9% |
| 2020 | $72.05 | +14.2% |
| 2021 | $97.03 | +34.7% |
| 2022 | $82.60 | -14.9% |
| 2023 | $98.04 | +18.7% |
| 2024 | $104.88 | +7.0% |
| 2025 | $113.86 | +8.6% |
| Year | Yield |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.74% |
| 2017 | 0.74% |
| 2018 | 0.91% |
| 2019 | 0.95% |
| 2020 | 1.54% |
| 2021 | 0.78% |
| 2022 | 1.22% |
| 2023 | 1.35% |
| 2024 | 1.41% |
| 2025 | 1.14% |
| Year | AUM | % Chg |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | $0.6B | -- |
| 2017 | $0.8B | +33.3% |
| 2018 | $0.8B | +0.0% |
| 2019 | $1.1B | +37.5% |
| 2020 | $1.3B | +18.2% |
| 2021 | $1.7B | +30.8% |
| 2022 | $1.5B | -11.8% |
| 2023 | $1.8B | +20.0% |
| 2024 | $1.9B | +5.6% |
| 2025 | $2.1B | +10.5% |
Price history from exchange data. Dividend yields from reported distributions; some earlier years are derived from total-return vs price-return data or are ETFHub estimates. AUM history is an ETFHub estimate modelled from current assets and annual returns (fund flows not reflected) and may differ from official fund records. Data as of October 2026.
Related US Broad Market ETFs
Markets. Intelligence. Daily.
Full briefs on 500+ ETFs, curated daily ETF news, and a free weekly deep-dive newsletter — all on ETFHub.
Get the Free Weekly Brief Explore the ETF Portal Official Fund Page →